Commit 86cbbe24 authored by Eric Engestrom's avatar Eric Engestrom Committed by Jonathan Corbet

Documentation: robust-futexes: fix spelling mistakes

Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
parent c0270efc
......@@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ vma based method:
- no VM changes are needed - 'struct address_space' is left alone.
- no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes dont
- no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes don't
need any extra per-lock syscalls. Robust mutexes thus become a very
lightweight primitive - so they dont force the application designer
lightweight primitive - so they don't force the application designer
to do a hard choice between performance and robustness - robust
mutexes are just as fast.
......@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ and the remaining bits are for the TID.
Testing, architecture support
-----------------------------
i've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the
I've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the
parsing of the userspace list is robust [ ;-) ] even if the list is
deliberately corrupted.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment