Commit 0472f94c authored by Matthew Wilcox's avatar Matthew Wilcox Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

idr: fix invalid ptr dereference on item delete

commit 7a4deea1 upstream.

If the radix tree underlying the IDR happens to be full and we attempt
to remove an id which is larger than any id in the IDR, we will call
__radix_tree_delete() with an uninitialised 'slot' pointer, at which
point anything could happen.  This was easiest to hit with a single
entry at id 0 and attempting to remove a non-0 id, but it could have
happened with 64 entries and attempting to remove an id >= 64.

Roman said:

  The syzcaller test boils down to opening /dev/kvm, creating an
  eventfd, and calling a couple of KVM ioctls. None of this requires
  superuser. And the result is dereferencing an uninitialized pointer
  which is likely a crash. The specific path caught by syzbot is via
  KVM_HYPERV_EVENTD ioctl which is new in 4.17. But I guess there are
  other user-triggerable paths, so cc:stable is probably justified.

Matthew added:

  We have around 250 calls to idr_remove() in the kernel today. Many of
  them pass an ID which is embedded in the object they're removing, so
  they're safe. Picking a few likely candidates:

  drivers/firewire/core-cdev.c looks unsafe; the ID comes from an ioctl.
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c is similar
  drivers/atm/nicstar.c could be taken down by a handcrafted packet

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180518175025.GD6361@bombadil.infradead.org
Fixes: 0a835c4f ("Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree")
Reported-by: <syzbot+35666cba7f0a337e2e79@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Debugged-by: default avatarRoman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 2a039b93
......@@ -2037,10 +2037,12 @@ void *radix_tree_delete_item(struct radix_tree_root *root,
unsigned long index, void *item)
{
struct radix_tree_node *node = NULL;
void __rcu **slot;
void __rcu **slot = NULL;
void *entry;
entry = __radix_tree_lookup(root, index, &node, &slot);
if (!slot)
return NULL;
if (!entry && (!is_idr(root) || node_tag_get(root, node, IDR_FREE,
get_slot_offset(node, slot))))
return NULL;
......
......@@ -202,6 +202,13 @@ void idr_checks(void)
idr_remove(&idr, 3);
idr_remove(&idr, 0);
assert(idr_alloc(&idr, DUMMY_PTR, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL) == 0);
idr_remove(&idr, 1);
for (i = 1; i < RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE; i++)
assert(idr_alloc(&idr, DUMMY_PTR, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL) == i);
idr_remove(&idr, 1 << 30);
idr_destroy(&idr);
for (i = INT_MAX - 3UL; i < INT_MAX + 1UL; i++) {
struct item *item = item_create(i, 0);
assert(idr_alloc(&idr, item, i, i + 10, GFP_KERNEL) == i);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment