Commit af9379c7 authored by David Brownell's avatar David Brownell Committed by Linus Torvalds

documentation: when to BUG(), and when to not BUG()

Provide some basic advice about when to use BUG()/BUG_ON(): never, unless
there's really no better option.

This matches my understanding of the standard policy ...  which seems not
to be written down so far, outside of LKML messages that I haven't
bookmarked.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 5f820f64
......@@ -28,6 +28,17 @@ struct bug_entry {
#define BUGFLAG_WARNING (1<<0)
#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */
/*
* Don't use BUG() or BUG_ON() unless there's really no way out; one
* example might be detecting data structure corruption in the middle
* of an operation that can't be backed out of. If the (sub)system
* can somehow continue operating, perhaps with reduced functionality,
* it's probably not BUG-worthy.
*
* If you're tempted to BUG(), think again: is completely giving up
* really the *only* solution? There are usually better options, where
* users don't need to reboot ASAP and can mostly shut down cleanly.
*/
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
#define BUG() do { \
printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
......@@ -39,6 +50,12 @@ struct bug_entry {
#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (unlikely(condition)) BUG(); } while(0)
#endif
/*
* WARN(), WARN_ON(), WARN_ON_ONCE, and so on can be used to report
* significant issues that need prompt attention if they should ever
* appear at runtime. Use the versions with printk format strings
* to provide better diagnostics.
*/
#ifndef __WARN
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
extern void warn_slowpath(const char *file, const int line,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment