Commit d3a024ab authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney

locking: Remove spin_unlock_wait() generic definitions

There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair.  This commit therefore removes spin_unlock_wait() and related
definitions from core code.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent a4f08141
......@@ -21,17 +21,6 @@
#include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>
/**
* queued_spin_unlock_wait - wait until the _current_ lock holder releases the lock
* @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
*
* There is a very slight possibility of live-lock if the lockers keep coming
* and the waiter is just unfortunate enough to not see any unlock state.
*/
#ifndef queued_spin_unlock_wait
extern void queued_spin_unlock_wait(struct qspinlock *lock);
#endif
/**
* queued_spin_is_locked - is the spinlock locked?
* @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
......@@ -41,8 +30,6 @@ extern void queued_spin_unlock_wait(struct qspinlock *lock);
static __always_inline int queued_spin_is_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
/*
* See queued_spin_unlock_wait().
*
* Any !0 state indicates it is locked, even if _Q_LOCKED_VAL
* isn't immediately observable.
*/
......@@ -135,6 +122,5 @@ static __always_inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
#define arch_spin_trylock(l) queued_spin_trylock(l)
#define arch_spin_unlock(l) queued_spin_unlock(l)
#define arch_spin_lock_flags(l, f) queued_spin_lock(l)
#define arch_spin_unlock_wait(l) queued_spin_unlock_wait(l)
#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_QSPINLOCK_H */
......@@ -130,12 +130,6 @@ do { \
#define smp_mb__before_spinlock() smp_wmb()
#endif
/**
* raw_spin_unlock_wait - wait until the spinlock gets unlocked
* @lock: the spinlock in question.
*/
#define raw_spin_unlock_wait(lock) arch_spin_unlock_wait(&(lock)->raw_lock)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
extern void do_raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
#define do_raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) do_raw_spin_lock(lock)
......@@ -369,11 +363,6 @@ static __always_inline int spin_trylock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
})
static __always_inline void spin_unlock_wait(spinlock_t *lock)
{
raw_spin_unlock_wait(&lock->rlock);
}
static __always_inline int spin_is_locked(spinlock_t *lock)
{
return raw_spin_is_locked(&lock->rlock);
......
......@@ -26,11 +26,6 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
#define arch_spin_is_locked(x) ((x)->slock == 0)
static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->slock, VAL);
}
static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
lock->slock = 0;
......@@ -73,7 +68,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
#else /* DEBUG_SPINLOCK */
#define arch_spin_is_locked(lock) ((void)(lock), 0)
#define arch_spin_unlock_wait(lock) do { barrier(); (void)(lock); } while (0)
/* for sched/core.c and kernel_lock.c: */
# define arch_spin_lock(lock) do { barrier(); (void)(lock); } while (0)
# define arch_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) do { barrier(); (void)(lock); } while (0)
......
......@@ -268,123 +268,6 @@ static __always_inline u32 __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
#define queued_spin_lock_slowpath native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
#endif
/*
* Various notes on spin_is_locked() and spin_unlock_wait(), which are
* 'interesting' functions:
*
* PROBLEM: some architectures have an interesting issue with atomic ACQUIRE
* operations in that the ACQUIRE applies to the LOAD _not_ the STORE (ARM64,
* PPC). Also qspinlock has a similar issue per construction, the setting of
* the locked byte can be unordered acquiring the lock proper.
*
* This gets to be 'interesting' in the following cases, where the /should/s
* end up false because of this issue.
*
*
* CASE 1:
*
* So the spin_is_locked() correctness issue comes from something like:
*
* CPU0 CPU1
*
* global_lock(); local_lock(i)
* spin_lock(&G) spin_lock(&L[i])
* for (i) if (!spin_is_locked(&G)) {
* spin_unlock_wait(&L[i]); smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
* return;
* }
* // deal with fail
*
* Where it is important CPU1 sees G locked or CPU0 sees L[i] locked such
* that there is exclusion between the two critical sections.
*
* The load from spin_is_locked(&G) /should/ be constrained by the ACQUIRE from
* spin_lock(&L[i]), and similarly the load(s) from spin_unlock_wait(&L[i])
* /should/ be constrained by the ACQUIRE from spin_lock(&G).
*
* Similarly, later stuff is constrained by the ACQUIRE from CTRL+RMB.
*
*
* CASE 2:
*
* For spin_unlock_wait() there is a second correctness issue, namely:
*
* CPU0 CPU1
*
* flag = set;
* smp_mb(); spin_lock(&l)
* spin_unlock_wait(&l); if (!flag)
* // add to lockless list
* spin_unlock(&l);
* // iterate lockless list
*
* Which wants to ensure that CPU1 will stop adding bits to the list and CPU0
* will observe the last entry on the list (if spin_unlock_wait() had ACQUIRE
* semantics etc..)
*
* Where flag /should/ be ordered against the locked store of l.
*/
/*
* queued_spin_lock_slowpath() can (load-)ACQUIRE the lock before
* issuing an _unordered_ store to set _Q_LOCKED_VAL.
*
* This means that the store can be delayed, but no later than the
* store-release from the unlock. This means that simply observing
* _Q_LOCKED_VAL is not sufficient to determine if the lock is acquired.
*
* There are two paths that can issue the unordered store:
*
* (1) clear_pending_set_locked(): *,1,0 -> *,0,1
*
* (2) set_locked(): t,0,0 -> t,0,1 ; t != 0
* atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(): t,0,0 -> 0,0,1
*
* However, in both cases we have other !0 state we've set before to queue
* ourseves:
*
* For (1) we have the atomic_cmpxchg_acquire() that set _Q_PENDING_VAL, our
* load is constrained by that ACQUIRE to not pass before that, and thus must
* observe the store.
*
* For (2) we have a more intersting scenario. We enqueue ourselves using
* xchg_tail(), which ends up being a RELEASE. This in itself is not
* sufficient, however that is followed by an smp_cond_acquire() on the same
* word, giving a RELEASE->ACQUIRE ordering. This again constrains our load and
* guarantees we must observe that store.
*
* Therefore both cases have other !0 state that is observable before the
* unordered locked byte store comes through. This means we can use that to
* wait for the lock store, and then wait for an unlock.
*/
#ifndef queued_spin_unlock_wait
void queued_spin_unlock_wait(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
u32 val;
for (;;) {
val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
if (!val) /* not locked, we're done */
goto done;
if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) /* locked, go wait for unlock */
break;
/* not locked, but pending, wait until we observe the lock */
cpu_relax();
}
/* any unlock is good */
while (atomic_read(&lock->val) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
cpu_relax();
done:
smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_unlock_wait);
#endif
#endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment