Commit 559c1730 authored by Eric Biggers's avatar Eric Biggers Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: chacha20poly1305 - set cra_name correctly

commit 5e27f38f1f3f45a0c938299c3a34a2d2db77165a upstream.

If the rfc7539 template is instantiated with specific implementations,
e.g. "rfc7539(chacha20-generic,poly1305-generic)" rather than
"rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", then the implementation names end up
included in the instance's cra_name.  This is incorrect because it then
prevents all users from allocating "rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", if the
highest priority implementations of chacha20 and poly1305 were selected.
Also, the self-tests aren't run on an instance allocated in this way.

Fix it by setting the instance's cra_name from the underlying
algorithms' actual cra_names, rather than from the requested names.
This matches what other templates do.

Fixes: 71ebc4d1 ("crypto: chacha20poly1305 - Add a ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD construction, RFC7539")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2+
Cc: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMartin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 2373ac08
......@@ -647,8 +647,8 @@ static int chachapoly_create(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb,
err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
"%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha_name,
poly_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
"%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->base.cra_name,
poly->cra_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
goto out_drop_chacha;
if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_driver_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
"%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->base.cra_driver_name,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment