Commit 8857563b authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney

notifier: Substitute rcu_access_pointer() for rcu_dereference_raw()

(Trivial patch.)

If the code is looking at the RCU-protected pointer itself, but not
dereferencing it, the rcu_dereference() functions can be downgraded
to rcu_access_pointer().  This commit makes this downgrade in
__blocking_notifier_call_chain() which simply compares the RCU-protected
pointer against NULL with no dereferencing.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
parent add1f099
......@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ int __blocking_notifier_call_chain(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
* racy then it does not matter what the result of the test
* is, we re-check the list after having taken the lock anyway:
*/
if (rcu_dereference_raw(nh->head)) {
if (rcu_access_pointer(nh->head)) {
down_read(&nh->rwsem);
ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, nr_to_call,
nr_calls);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment