As long as the context tracking is enabled on any CPU, even
a single one, all other CPUs need to keep track of their
user <-> kernel boundaries cross as well.

This is because a task can sleep while servicing an exception
that happened in the kernel or in userspace. Then when the task
eventually wakes up and return from the exception, the CPU needs
to know if we resume in userspace or in the kernel. exception_exit()
get this information from exception_enter() that saved the previous
state.

If the CPU where the exception happened didn't keep track of
these informations, exception_exit() doesn't know which state
tracking to restore on the CPU where the task got migrated
and we may return to userspace with the context tracking
subsystem thinking that we are in kernel mode.

This can be fixed in the long term if we move our context tracking
probes on very low level arch fast path user <-> kernel boundary,
although even that is worrisome as an exception can still happen
in the few instructions between the probe and the actual iret.

Also we are not yet ready to set these probes in the fast path given
the potential overhead problem it induces.

So let's fix this by always enable context tracking even on CPUs
that are not in the full dynticks range. OTOH we can spare the
rcu_user_*() and vtime_user_*() calls there because the tick runs
on these CPUs and we can handle RCU state machine and cputime
accounting through it.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>