Commit 795ae7a0 authored by Johannes Weiner's avatar Johannes Weiner Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm: scale kswapd watermarks in proportion to memory

In machines with 140G of memory and enterprise flash storage, we have
seen read and write bursts routinely exceed the kswapd watermarks and
cause thundering herds in direct reclaim.  Unfortunately, the only way
to tune kswapd aggressiveness is through adjusting min_free_kbytes - the
system's emergency reserves - which is entirely unrelated to the
system's latency requirements.  In order to get kswapd to maintain a
250M buffer of free memory, the emergency reserves need to be set to 1G.
That is a lot of memory wasted for no good reason.

On the other hand, it's reasonable to assume that allocation bursts and
overall allocation concurrency scale with memory capacity, so it makes
sense to make kswapd aggressiveness a function of that as well.

Change the kswapd watermark scale factor from the currently fixed 25% of
the tunable emergency reserve to a tunable 0.1% of memory.

Beyond 1G of memory, this will produce bigger watermark steps than the
current formula in default settings.  Ensure that the new formula never
chooses steps smaller than that, i.e.  25% of the emergency reserve.

On a 140G machine, this raises the default watermark steps - the
distance between min and low, and low and high - from 16M to 143M.
Signed-off-by: 's avatarJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: 's avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: 's avatarRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: 's avatarDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: 's avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: 's avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 3ed3a4f0
......@@ -803,6 +803,24 @@ performance impact. Reclaim code needs to take various locks to find freeable
directory and inode objects. With vfs_cache_pressure=1000, it will look for
ten times more freeable objects than there are.
=============================================================
watermark_scale_factor:
This factor controls the aggressiveness of kswapd. It defines the
amount of memory left in a node/system before kswapd is woken up and
how much memory needs to be free before kswapd goes back to sleep.
The unit is in fractions of 10,000. The default value of 10 means the
distances between watermarks are 0.1% of the available memory in the
node/system. The maximum value is 1000, or 10% of memory.
A high rate of threads entering direct reclaim (allocstall) or kswapd
going to sleep prematurely (kswapd_low_wmark_hit_quickly) can indicate
that the number of free pages kswapd maintains for latency reasons is
too small for the allocation bursts occurring in the system. This knob
can then be used to tune kswapd aggressiveness accordingly.
==============================================================
zone_reclaim_mode:
......
......@@ -1889,6 +1889,7 @@ extern void zone_pcp_reset(struct zone *zone);
/* page_alloc.c */
extern int min_free_kbytes;
extern int watermark_scale_factor;
/* nommu.c */
extern atomic_long_t mmap_pages_allocated;
......
......@@ -841,6 +841,8 @@ static inline int is_highmem(struct zone *zone)
struct ctl_table;
int min_free_kbytes_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
int watermark_scale_factor_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
extern int sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio[MAX_NR_ZONES-1];
int lowmem_reserve_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
......
......@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused two = 2;
static int __maybe_unused four = 4;
static unsigned long one_ul = 1;
static int one_hundred = 100;
static int one_thousand = 1000;
#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
static int ten_thousand = 10000;
#endif
......@@ -1403,6 +1404,15 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
.proc_handler = min_free_kbytes_sysctl_handler,
.extra1 = &zero,
},
{
.procname = "watermark_scale_factor",
.data = &watermark_scale_factor,
.maxlen = sizeof(watermark_scale_factor),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = watermark_scale_factor_sysctl_handler,
.extra1 = &one,
.extra2 = &one_thousand,
},
{
.procname = "percpu_pagelist_fraction",
.data = &percpu_pagelist_fraction,
......
......@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ compound_page_dtor * const compound_page_dtors[] = {
int min_free_kbytes = 1024;
int user_min_free_kbytes = -1;
int watermark_scale_factor = 10;
static unsigned long __meminitdata nr_kernel_pages;
static unsigned long __meminitdata nr_all_pages;
......@@ -6347,8 +6348,17 @@ static void __setup_per_zone_wmarks(void)
zone->watermark[WMARK_MIN] = tmp;
}
zone->watermark[WMARK_LOW] = min_wmark_pages(zone) + (tmp >> 2);
zone->watermark[WMARK_HIGH] = min_wmark_pages(zone) + (tmp >> 1);
/*
* Set the kswapd watermarks distance according to the
* scale factor in proportion to available memory, but
* ensure a minimum size on small systems.
*/
tmp = max_t(u64, tmp >> 2,
mult_frac(zone->managed_pages,
watermark_scale_factor, 10000));
zone->watermark[WMARK_LOW] = min_wmark_pages(zone) + tmp;
zone->watermark[WMARK_HIGH] = min_wmark_pages(zone) + tmp * 2;
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ALLOC_BATCH,
high_wmark_pages(zone) - low_wmark_pages(zone) -
......@@ -6489,6 +6499,21 @@ int min_free_kbytes_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
return 0;
}
int watermark_scale_factor_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
{
int rc;
rc = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
if (rc)
return rc;
if (write)
setup_per_zone_wmarks();
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment