Commit 2c616d4d authored by David Howells's avatar David Howells Committed by Al Viro

SELinux: Use d_is_positive() rather than testing dentry->d_inode

Use d_is_positive() rather than testing dentry->d_inode in SELinux to get rid
of direct references to d_inode outside of the VFS.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent 8802565b
......@@ -1822,12 +1822,12 @@ static inline int may_rename(struct inode *old_dir,
ad.u.dentry = new_dentry;
av = DIR__ADD_NAME | DIR__SEARCH;
if (new_dentry->d_inode)
if (d_is_positive(new_dentry))
av |= DIR__REMOVE_NAME;
rc = avc_has_perm(sid, new_dsec->sid, SECCLASS_DIR, av, &ad);
if (rc)
return rc;
if (new_dentry->d_inode) {
if (d_is_positive(new_dentry)) {
new_isec = new_dentry->d_inode->i_security;
new_is_dir = S_ISDIR(new_dentry->d_inode->i_mode);
rc = avc_has_perm(sid, new_isec->sid,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment