Commit 4e70daaf authored by Jiri Kosina's avatar Jiri Kosina

tpm_tis: fix tis_lock with respect to RCU

cleanup_tis() -> tpm_remove_hardware() -> syncrhonize_rcu() is being
called in an atomic context (tis_lock spinlock held), which is not
allowed. Convert tis_lock to mutex.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Tested-by: default avatarStefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarRajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
parent c3363c91
......@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ enum tis_defaults {
#define TPM_RID(l) (0x0F04 | ((l) << 12))
static LIST_HEAD(tis_chips);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tis_lock);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(tis_lock);
#if defined(CONFIG_PNP) && defined(CONFIG_ACPI)
static int is_itpm(struct pnp_dev *dev)
......@@ -689,9 +689,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, resource_size_t start,
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chip->vendor.list);
spin_lock(&tis_lock);
mutex_lock(&tis_lock);
list_add(&chip->vendor.list, &tis_chips);
spin_unlock(&tis_lock);
mutex_unlock(&tis_lock);
return 0;
......@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static void __exit cleanup_tis(void)
{
struct tpm_vendor_specific *i, *j;
struct tpm_chip *chip;
spin_lock(&tis_lock);
mutex_lock(&tis_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(i, j, &tis_chips, list) {
chip = to_tpm_chip(i);
tpm_remove_hardware(chip->dev);
......@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static void __exit cleanup_tis(void)
iounmap(i->iobase);
list_del(&i->list);
}
spin_unlock(&tis_lock);
mutex_unlock(&tis_lock);
#ifdef CONFIG_PNP
if (!force) {
pnp_unregister_driver(&tis_pnp_driver);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment