Commit 5930589d authored by Tao Wang's avatar Tao Wang Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: Fix new policy initialization during limits updates via sysfs

commit c7d1f119c48f64bebf0fa1e326af577c6152fe30 upstream.

If the policy limits are updated via cpufreq_update_policy() and
subsequently via sysfs, the limits stored in user_policy may be
set incorrectly.

For example, if both min and max are set via sysfs to the maximum
available frequency, user_policy.min and user_policy.max will also
be the maximum.  If a policy notifier triggered by
cpufreq_update_policy() lowers both the min and the max at this
point, that change is not reflected by the user_policy limits, so
if the max is updated again via sysfs to the same lower value,
then user_policy.max will be lower than user_policy.min which
shouldn't happen.  In particular, if one of the policy CPUs is
then taken offline and back online, cpufreq_set_policy() will
fail for it due to a failing limits check.

To prevent that from happening, initialize the min and max fields
of the new_policy object to the ones stored in user_policy that
were previously set via sysfs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@hisilicon.com>
Acked-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent a6c9a62e
......@@ -657,6 +657,8 @@ static ssize_t store_##file_name \
struct cpufreq_policy new_policy; \
\
memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy)); \
new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min; \
new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max; \
\
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &new_policy.object); \
if (ret != 1) \
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment