Commit a49f0347 authored by Alexander Aring's avatar Alexander Aring Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

net: ieee802154: 6lowpan: fix frag reassembly

commit f18fa5de5ba7f1d6650951502bb96a6e4715a948 upstream.

This patch initialize stack variables which are used in
frag_lowpan_compare_key to zero. In my case there are padding bytes in the
structures ieee802154_addr as well in frag_lowpan_compare_key. Otherwise
the key variable contains random bytes. The result is that a compare of
two keys by memcmp works incorrect.

Fixes: 648700f76b03 ("inet: frags: use rhashtables for reassembly units")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexander Aring <aring@mojatatu.com>
Reported-by: default avatarStefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 2188cf06
......@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ typedef unsigned __bitwise__ lowpan_rx_result;
struct frag_lowpan_compare_key {
u16 tag;
u16 d_size;
const struct ieee802154_addr src;
const struct ieee802154_addr dst;
struct ieee802154_addr src;
struct ieee802154_addr dst;
};
/* Equivalent of ipv4 struct ipq
......
......@@ -74,14 +74,14 @@ fq_find(struct net *net, const struct lowpan_802154_cb *cb,
{
struct netns_ieee802154_lowpan *ieee802154_lowpan =
net_ieee802154_lowpan(net);
struct frag_lowpan_compare_key key = {
.tag = cb->d_tag,
.d_size = cb->d_size,
.src = *src,
.dst = *dst,
};
struct frag_lowpan_compare_key key = {};
struct inet_frag_queue *q;
key.tag = cb->d_tag;
key.d_size = cb->d_size;
key.src = *src;
key.dst = *dst;
q = inet_frag_find(&ieee802154_lowpan->frags, &key);
if (!q)
return NULL;
......@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ int lowpan_frag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 frag_type)
struct lowpan_frag_queue *fq;
struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
struct lowpan_802154_cb *cb = lowpan_802154_cb(skb);
struct ieee802154_hdr hdr;
struct ieee802154_hdr hdr = {};
int err;
if (ieee802154_hdr_peek_addrs(skb, &hdr) < 0)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment