Commit db3e8db4 authored by Boqun Feng's avatar Boqun Feng Committed by Paul E. McKenney

rcu: Use call_rcu_func_t to replace explicit type equivalents

We have had the call_rcu_func_t typedef for a quite awhile, but we still
use explicit function pointer types in some places.  These types can
confuse cscope and can be hard to read.  This patch therefore replaces
these types with the call_rcu_func_t typedef.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
parent b6a4ae76
......@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ struct rcu_torture_ops {
void (*exp_sync)(void);
unsigned long (*get_state)(void);
void (*cond_sync)(unsigned long oldstate);
void (*call)(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu));
call_rcu_func_t call;
void (*cb_barrier)(void);
void (*fqs)(void);
void (*stats)(void);
......
......@@ -464,8 +464,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
/* shut bogus gcc warning) */
u8 flavor_mask; /* bit in flavor mask. */
struct rcu_data __percpu *rda; /* pointer of percu rcu_data. */
void (*call)(struct rcu_head *head, /* call_rcu() flavor. */
void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
call_rcu_func_t call; /* call_rcu() flavor. */
/* The following fields are guarded by the root rcu_node's lock. */
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment