Commit 92f9c5c4 authored by Lai Jiangshan's avatar Lai Jiangshan Committed by Tejun Heo

workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex

manager_mutex is only used to protect the attaching for the pool
and the pool->workers list. It protects the pool->workers and operations
based on this list, such as:

	cpu-binding for the workers in the pool->workers
	the operations to set/clear WORKER_UNBOUND

So let's rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex to better reflect its
role. This patch is a pure rename.

tj: Minor command and description updates.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
parent 4d757c5c
......@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
* be executing on any CPU. The pool behaves as an unbound one.
*
* Note that DISASSOCIATED should be flipped only while holding
* manager_mutex to avoid changing binding state while
* attach_mutex to avoid changing binding state while
* create_worker() is in progress.
*/
POOL_DISASSOCIATED = 1 << 2, /* cpu can't serve workers */
......@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ enum {
* cpu or grabbing pool->lock is enough for read access. If
* POOL_DISASSOCIATED is set, it's identical to L.
*
* M: pool->manager_mutex protected.
* A: pool->attach_mutex protected.
*
* PL: wq_pool_mutex protected.
*
......@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ struct worker_pool {
/* see manage_workers() for details on the two manager mutexes */
struct mutex manager_arb; /* manager arbitration */
struct mutex manager_mutex; /* manager exclusion */
struct list_head workers; /* M: attached workers */
struct mutex attach_mutex; /* attach/detach exclusion */
struct list_head workers; /* A: attached workers */
struct completion *detach_completion; /* all workers detached */
struct ida worker_ida; /* worker IDs for task name */
......@@ -367,14 +367,14 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
* @worker: iteration cursor
* @pool: worker_pool to iterate workers of
*
* This must be called with @pool->manager_mutex.
* This must be called with @pool->attach_mutex.
*
* The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
* ignored.
*/
#define for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) \
list_for_each_entry((worker), &(pool)->workers, node) \
if (({ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); false; })) { } \
if (({ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->attach_mutex); false; })) { } \
else
/**
......@@ -1696,11 +1696,11 @@ static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker,
{
struct completion *detach_completion = NULL;
mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
list_del(&worker->node);
if (list_empty(&pool->workers))
detach_completion = pool->detach_completion;
mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (detach_completion)
complete(detach_completion);
......@@ -1753,7 +1753,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
/* prevent userland from meddling with cpumask of workqueue workers */
worker->task->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
/*
* set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will fail if the cpumask doesn't have any
......@@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
/*
* The pool->manager_mutex ensures %POOL_DISASSOCIATED
* The pool->attach_mutex ensures %POOL_DISASSOCIATED
* remains stable across this function. See the comments above the
* flag definition for details.
*/
......@@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
/* successful, attach the worker to the pool */
list_add_tail(&worker->node, &pool->workers);
mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
return worker;
......@@ -3456,7 +3456,7 @@ static int init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
(unsigned long)pool);
mutex_init(&pool->manager_arb);
mutex_init(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_init(&pool->attach_mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->workers);
ida_init(&pool->worker_ida);
......@@ -3513,7 +3513,7 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
/*
* Become the manager and destroy all workers. Grabbing
* manager_arb prevents @pool's workers from blocking on
* manager_mutex.
* attach_mutex.
*/
mutex_lock(&pool->manager_arb);
......@@ -3523,10 +3523,10 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
WARN_ON(pool->nr_workers || pool->nr_idle);
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (!list_empty(&pool->workers))
pool->detach_completion = &detach_completion;
mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (pool->detach_completion)
wait_for_completion(pool->detach_completion);
......@@ -4513,11 +4513,11 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());
mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
/*
* We've blocked all manager operations. Make all workers
* We've blocked all attach/detach operations. Make all workers
* unbound and set DISASSOCIATED. Before this, all workers
* except for the ones which are still executing works from
* before the last CPU down must be on the cpu. After
......@@ -4529,7 +4529,7 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
/*
* Call schedule() so that we cross rq->lock and thus can
......@@ -4570,7 +4570,7 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
{
struct worker *worker;
lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
lockdep_assert_held(&pool->attach_mutex);
/*
* Restore CPU affinity of all workers. As all idle workers should
......@@ -4638,7 +4638,7 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
static cpumask_t cpumask;
struct worker *worker;
lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
lockdep_assert_held(&pool->attach_mutex);
/* is @cpu allowed for @pool? */
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, pool->attrs->cpumask))
......@@ -4683,7 +4683,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
......@@ -4695,7 +4695,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
}
mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
}
/* update NUMA affinity of unbound workqueues */
......
......@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ struct worker {
struct task_struct *task; /* I: worker task */
struct worker_pool *pool; /* I: the associated pool */
/* L: for rescuers */
struct list_head node; /* M: anchored at pool->workers */
/* M: runs through worker->node */
struct list_head node; /* A: anchored at pool->workers */
/* A: runs through worker->node */
unsigned long last_active; /* L: last active timestamp */
unsigned int flags; /* X: flags */
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment