Douglas Anderson authored Sep 27, 2019 and Simon Glass committed Oct 15, 2019

As per the centithread on ksummit-discuss [1], there are folks who
feel that if a Change-Id is present in a developer's local commit that
said Change-Id could be interesting to include in upstream posts.
Specifically if two commits are posted with the same Change-Id there's
a reasonable chance that they are either the same commit or a newer
version of the same commit.  Specifically this is because that's how
gerrit has trained people to work.

There is much angst about Change-Id in upstream Linux, but one thing
that seems safe and non-controversial is to include the Change-Id as
part of the string of crud that makes up a Message-Id.

Let's give that a try.

In theory (if there is enough adoption) this could help a tool more
reliably find various versions of a commit.  This actually might work
pretty well for U-Boot where (I believe) quite a number of developers
use patman, so there could be critical mass (assuming that enough of
these people...